7.0.
Seem
to lave acted
bey well.
?
Ack. I say
165.
2.5. visuo
the
vsalt
B
their representations with much
boult
Consider
The appeal
165
ought to have been Conducted by the Treads
i solicitar.
satisfaction & Ca
↓
authorised to receive
receipt pay
have been informed of
£ 205-14~4 from 7.0.
Incest Sutton, Ommancy & Kendall,
& to send in
De
account of the
cost of prisoners
maintenance, when rec! to 70.
Tell C. a.
by
about
レ
kul
Them
to
ask for. for
don't know
(without exclus)
J
account if they
sending comes of the despatch
[2666 Sutton, Ommany a Rendall
alro
bell
them
That
C-a.
have been
authorised
to receive pay
•
alove
in due
Courde
1571/15
He
maashat
vista
CWD
]
Treasure's Beet
5.0 4 R
profound
15/1/15
in Callery
om attention to the penul.
timate senteme
TVE is to tell as
2 that they
No Buch limit is
realid
41
Au 70.
Conest with Treasury
KİR
I uron letter to 70 1 of 17 March (5822/14)
AN
In this
Connexion su
Sir Jaudissoni minuti
thom
on Ad22
Le
Second
meniti
om position doesnt seem White Logical.
JH.Z. apperent bears thi 12.
the trial.
expense o
but 7o. that other appeil
& prisoners
C? Juice
Conviction
main teneur
ий деле
q
Генами
nii
to be treated
of this is
entirely
دسالاری
matter
Then
а
Consular
zo.cught
a
ro bear the expense of the first trial & of all maintename alte appeal aught to have been entrust 10 the Trees sorar-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.